 |
 |
 |
New Ideas, Methods and Products Series
Volume III
 |
 |
 |

|
 |
International Protection: Patents, Trademarks
and Copyrights
THE PROCEDURE
Obtaining protection for
patents, trademarks
and copyrights in the U.S.
alone is no longer
sufficient in the modern
atmosphere of international
competition and global
markets. International
protection often needs
to be extensive and
can be quite expensive,
but there are ways
to reduce and postpone
the expense in some
cases. Protection must
be considered in countries
where you intend to market
the new product
or where competitors may
be poised to imitate
your product.
There are a number of ways
to go about securing
patent, copyright and trademark
protection
in other countries. This
primer explains
the basic approaches available.
Other primers
in the series discuss:
what things are protectable
by patent, trademark, copyright
and trade
secret; how to establish
those property rights;
licensing of ideas and
products; various
agreements used to protect
the ideas and
products such as employment
agreements, confidential
disclosure agreements,
consultant, supplier
and customer agreements,
and visitor forms;
infringement and litigation;
the formal procedure
for obtaining protection
from conception
of an idea to interaction
with the Patent
and Trademark Office and
the Copyright Office;
the protection and licensing
of biotechnology;
protection for product
appearance beyond
patent and copyright; false
advertising --
what is and what isn't
permissible; comparative
advertising -- what can
you say about the
competition; software protection
and licensing;
and rights-in-data, patents,
and copyrights
under SBIR and other government
contracts.
PATENTS
A patent in one country
does not protect
the invention in any other
country: a novel
product or method must
be protected by a
separate patent in each
country. In addition,
each country has different
restrictions that
must be met or no patent
protection can be
obtained. The first and
most important restriction
is the time within which
you must file an
application to obtain a
patent in a country
or forever lose your right
to do so.
Not all countries are the
same with respect
to filing deadlines. For
example, in the
United States an inventor
may file an application
to obtain a patent on his
invention up to
one year after the invention
has become public
through a publication explaining
the invention,
a public use of the invention,
or sale or
offer for sale of the invention.
This one-year
period is known as the
period of grace.
There is no period of grace
in other countries
such as Great Britain,
West Germany, Sweden,
France, Italy, Switzerland,
Belgium, Austria,
Netherlands, Australia
and Japan. And each
country has a slightly
different view of
what constitutes making
an invention public.
In Japan, for example,
public use of an invention
before filing an application
bars a patent
only if the public use
occurred within Japan,
but in France any public
knowledge of the
invention anywhere bars
the patent.
Thus, while the U.S. allows
a business one
full year to test market
its new product,
most foreign countries
require that the patent
application be filed before
there is any
public disclosure, before
the owner can even
begin to determine whether
the new product
will be even a modest success.
So while you
can delay filing for a
year in the U.S.,
you have to file quickly
in each other country
of concern. And that is
not inexpensive,
especially when the U.S.
dollar is down against
the currencies of other
major countries.
But there are ways around
having to file
immediately, such as provided
for by treaty
known as the Paris Convention.
If you file
in the U.S. and then file
in any country
which is a party to the
Convention within
one year of the date on
which you filed in
the U.S., you can rely
on the U.S. filing
date. That is, as long
as you claim priority
under the Convention, the
filing date awarded
in that country will be
not the actual date
of filing in that country
but the date, up
to one year earlier, that
you filed in the
U.S.
In this way, by filing
one application for
the invention in the United
States you can
preserve your initial U.S.
filing date for
up to one year. What this
means is that you
can file an application
in the U.S., then
immediately make the invention
public by
advertising, published
articles and sales.
If within one year the
product appears to
be a success you can then
file in selected
foreign countries. Even
though the prior
public use of the invention
would ordinarily
bar your filing in those
countries, the Paris
Convention protects you.
Countries which
are members of the Paris
Convention include:
| Albania |
|
Libya |
| Algeria |
|
Liechtenstein |
| Argentina |
|
Lithuania |
| Armenia |
|
Luxembourg |
| Australia |
|
Madagascar |
| Austria |
|
Malawi |
| Azerbaijan |
|
Malaysia |
| Bahamas |
|
Mali |
| Bangladesh |
|
Malta |
| Barbados |
|
Mauritania |
| Belarus |
|
Mauritius |
| Belgium |
|
Mexico |
| Benin |
|
Monaco |
| Bolivia |
|
Mongolia |
| Bosnia & Herzegovina |
|
Morocco |
| Brazil |
|
The Netherlands |
| Bulgaria |
|
New Zealand |
| Burkina Faso |
|
Nicaragua |
| Burundi |
|
Niger |
| Cameroon |
|
Nigeria |
| Canada |
|
Norway |
| Central African Republic |
|
Panama |
| Chad |
|
Paraguay |
| Chile |
|
Peru |
| China |
|
Phillipines |
| Colombia |
|
Poland |
| Congo |
|
Portugal |
| Costa Rica |
|
Republic of Korea |
| Côte d'Ivoire |
|
Republic of Moldova |
| Croatia |
|
Romania |
| Cuba |
|
Russian Federation |
| Cyprus |
|
Rwanda |
| Czech Republic |
|
Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| Democratic People'sRepublic of Korea |
|
Saint Lucia |
| Denmark |
|
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| Dominican Republic |
|
San Marino |
| Egypt |
|
Senegal |
| El Salvador |
|
Singapore |
| Estonia |
|
Slovakia |
| Finland |
|
Slovenia |
| Grance |
|
Sout Africa |
| Gabon |
|
Spain |
| Gambia |
|
Sri Lanka |
| Georgia |
|
Sudan |
| Germany |
|
Suriname |
| Ghana |
|
Swaziland |
| Greece |
|
Sweden |
| Guinea |
|
Switzerland |
| Guinea-Bissau |
|
Syria |
| Guyana |
|
Tajikistan |
| Haiti |
|
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia |
| Holy See |
|
Togo |
| Honduras |
|
Trinidad and Tobago |
| Hungary |
|
Tunisia |
| Iceland |
|
Turkey |
| Indonesia |
|
Turkmenistan |
| Iran (Islamic Republic of) |
|
Uganda |
| Iraq |
|
Ukraine |
| Ireland |
|
United Arab Emirates |
| Israel |
|
United Kingdom |
| Italy |
|
United Republic of Tanzania |
| Japan |
|
United States of America |
| Jordan |
|
Uruguay |
| Kazakhstan |
|
Uzbekistan |
| Kenya |
|
Venezuela |
| Kyrgyzstan |
|
Viet Nam |
| Latvia |
|
Yugoslavia |
| Lebanon |
|
Zaire |
| Lesotho |
|
Zambia |
| Liberia |
|
Zimbabwe |
There are other means by
which you can further
postpone the cost of foreign
filings while
preserving your right to
file. For example,
another more recent treaty
known as the Patent
Cooperation Treaty (PCT)
permits a delay
of up to thirty (30) months
before actually
incurring the costs of
filing in individual
countries. The PCT option
is available if
you file and request PCT
treatment within
one year of your U.S. filing
date.
Thus by filing a PCT application
in specially
designated PCT offices
within one year of
your U.S. filing and by
designating certain
countries, you can preserve
your right to
file in those designated
countries without
further expense until thirty
(30) months
from the earlier U.S. filing
date. That provides
an additional eighteen
(18) months for test
marketing the product.
This does introduce
the extra cost of the PCT
application filing,
but if you are considering
filing in six
or eight or more countries,
the one extra
PCT filing may well be
worth it for two reasons.
First, it delays the outflow
of cash which
you may not now have or
may require for other
urgent needs. Second, if
the product proves
insufficiently successful
you can decide
not to file in any of the
countries designated
under the PCT and save
the cost of all six
national application filings.
Countries which are party
to the PCT include:
| Albania |
|
Lesotho |
| Algeria |
|
Liberia |
| Antigua and Barbuda |
|
Liechtenstein |
| Armenia |
|
Lithuania |
| Australia |
|
Luxembourg |
| Austria |
|
Madagascar |
| Azerbaijan |
|
Malawi |
| Barbados |
|
Mali |
| Belarus |
|
Mauritania |
| Belgium |
|
Mexico |
| Belize |
|
Monaco |
| Benin |
|
Mongolia |
| Bosnia & Herzegovina |
|
Morocco |
| Brazil |
|
Mozamabique |
| Bulgaria |
|
The Netherlands |
| Burkina Faso |
|
New Zealand |
| Cameroon |
|
Nicaragua |
| Canada |
|
Niger |
| Central African Republic |
|
Norway |
| Chad |
|
Poland |
| China |
|
Portugal |
| Congo |
|
Republic of Korea |
| Costa Rica |
|
Republic of Moldova |
| Côte d'Ivoire |
|
Romania |
| Croatia |
|
Russian Federation |
| Cuba |
|
Saint Lucia |
| Cyprus |
|
Senegal |
| Czech Republic |
|
Sierra Leone |
| Democratic People's Republic of Korea |
|
Singapore |
| Denmark |
|
Slovakia |
| Dominica |
|
Slovenia |
| Estonia |
|
South Africa |
| Finland |
|
Spain |
| France |
|
Sri Lanka |
| Gabon |
|
Sudan |
| Gambia |
|
Swaziland |
| Georgia |
|
Sweden |
| Germany |
|
Switzerland |
| Ghana |
|
Tajikistan |
| Greece |
|
The former Yugolsav Republic of Macedonia |
| Grenada |
|
Togo |
| Guinea |
|
Trinidad and Tobago |
| Guinea-Bissau |
|
Turkey |
| Hungary |
|
Turkmenistan |
| Iceland |
|
Uganda |
| India |
|
Ukraine |
| Indonesia |
|
United Arab Emirates |
| Ireland |
|
United Kingdom |
| Israel |
|
United Republic of Tanzania |
| Italy |
|
United States of America |
| Japan |
|
Uzbekistan |
| Kazakhstan |
|
Viet Nam |
| Kenya |
|
Yugoslavia |
| Kyrgyzstan |
|
Zimbabwe |
| Latvia |
|
|
Another cost-saving feature
of international
patent practice is the
European Patent Convention
(EPC), which is compatible
with the Paris
Convention and the PCT
and which enables
you to file a single European
patent application
and designate any one or
more of nineteen
(19) European countries
in which you wish
the patent to issue:
| Austria |
|
Liechtenstein |
| Belgium |
|
Luxembourg |
| Cyprus |
|
Monaco |
| Denmark |
|
Netherlands |
| Finland |
|
Portugal |
| France |
|
Spain |
| Germany |
|
Sweden |
| Hellenic Republic |
|
Switzerland |
| Italy |
|
United Kingdom |
| Ireland |
|
|
You can optimize your foreign
patent expense
and protection if you carefully
choose the
countries in which you
seek protection. First,
identify the countries
in which you see the
greatest market and the
countries in which
the potential product is
most likely to be
competitively manufactured.
Second, limit
your selection to those
manufacturing/marketing
countries which are most
appealing: Where
might the patent be best
policed? Where can
infringement be most easily
detected? Where
are your subsidiary/parent/joint
venture
partner companies located?
Where is your
largest customer? Your
fiercest competitor?
Awareness of these few
considerations can
maximize your patent protection
abroad while
minimizing your capital
investment, and postponing
or even avoiding entirely
the investment
of that capital.
TRADEMARKS
There are a number of international
treaties
which affect trademark
rights.
The three countries of
Belgium, Netherlands
and Luxembourg have joined
together under
the Benelux Union to form
a single trademark
territory. One registration
provides protection
in all three countries.
A number of countries have
formed the Madrid
Union, wherein one international
registration
will be recognized in all
the member states
unless specifically refused
by a member state.
Each member state may conduct
its own examination.
Currently, member states
include European
countries (except generally
the U.K. and
Ireland), African States
and the Russian
Federation. The Union applies
to: (1) a national
of a European Union member
State; (2) a national
of a country outside the
European Union,
if that country is a member
of the Paris
Convention; (3) a national
of a State which
is not a member of the
European Union or
the Paris Convention, but
who has his domicile
or real and commercial
establishment in a
member State of the European
Union or the
Paris Convention; and (4)
a national of a
country which is not a
member of the European
Union or the Paris Convention,
if that country
grants the same protection
to the nationals
of each member State of
the European Union
as to its own nationals
and which recognizes
the registration of a community
trademark.
The same Paris Convention
referred to earlier
with respect to patents
provides a six (6)
month right of priority:
a party may claim
a filing date in a Madrid
Union country up
to six months earlier based
on his U.S. filing
date. The term of the registration
is twenty
years. French-African states
and the island
of Madagascar have been
made into one unified
trademark territory under
a treaty known
as "OAMPI". The
Paris Convention
gives certain rights afforded
to citizens
of a member state to nationals
of other member
states. As previously indicated,
applications
for patents may receive
the benefit of a
one-year priority date;
applications for
trademark registration
receive a six-month
priority date based on
the home country filing
date.
A new and separate union
for the international
registration for trademarks
was founded in
1973, the Trademark Registration
Treaty.
International registration
may be obtained
under this treaty without
first having to
register the mark in the
applicant's home
country. The registration
is effective for
ten years and is renewable.
Although signed
by fourteen countries,
only five countries
have deposited an instrument
of accession
to the treaty, namely:
Congo, Gabon; Togo
Republic, Burkina Faso;
and the Russian Federation.
In the United States a
foreign applicant,
whose country of origin
is a party with the
U.S. to a trademark convention,
or extends
reciprocal rights to U.S.
nationals, may
base a U.S. application
on: (a) ownership
of a foreign trademark
registration; or (b)
ownership of a foreign
application if the
U.S. application is filed
within six months
of foreign filing.
If a mark has been registered
in a foreign
country, no use in commerce
must be alleged.
If relying on a foreign
application, no U.S.
registration will issue
until the applicant
alleges use or the foreign
registration issues.
Use of the mark is required
to maintain a
valid registration. The
use re-quirements
for obtaining U.S. trademark
registrations
have been eased for U.S.
nationals, too,
under a new law effective
November 1989.
While the U.S. is only
now eliminating its
traditional requirement
for actual use of
the trademark on the goods
in commerce before
application for registration
can be filed,
most other countries have
never had that
requirement. Australia,
Canada, West Germany,
Italy, Japan, Great Britain,
and Switzerland
permit filing with only
an intent to use.
France and Sweden do not
even require an
intent to use in order
to file.
COPYRIGHT
There are a number of international
treaties
which affect copyright,
the most important
of which are the Universal
Copyright Convention,
to which the U.S. has long
been a party,
and the premier treaty,
the Bern Union, to
which the U.S. has finally
fully acceded
with the amendments to
U.S. law effective
March 1, 1989.
The Universal Copyright
Convention (UCC),
adopted by eighty-one countries
including
the United States and the
Russian Federation,
requires that each country
treat nationals
of other member countries
the same as they
do their own citizens.
It gives copyrightable
works protected by the
UCC the same rights
as domestic works. The
UCC excuses compliance
with all domestic member
country formalities
with respect to unpublished
works, and published
works which display the
copyright notice,
name of owner, and year
of first publication.
In the United States, the
Congress has invoked
a restrictive provision
of the UCC to require
domestic formalities in
cases of works first
published in the United
States by U.S. citizens
or UCC member country nationals.
Accordingly,
foreign nationals can begin
a copyright infringement
action without having a
copyright notice
or a recordation. U.S.
citizens cannot. The
UCC requires nationals
to comply with the
formalities of their own
countries and avoids
foreign formalities.
The Bern Union includes
all major countries
including European countries,
Japan, and
most recently, the United
States. The Union
has minimum requirements
that must be met.
Namely: the duration of
the copyright must
be at least for the life
of the author plus
fifty years, and copyright
must be automatically
granted without the need
for formalities.
Accordingly, the United
States has formed
a two-tier system. Works
whose author's domicile
is a foreign state adhering
to the Bern Convention
and where publication occurs
first in a Bern
State (except the U.S.)
are exempt from the
registration application
prerequisite. Most
other works, most importantly
those of U.S.
domiciliaries, must comply
with the formalities
of notice and filing before
an infringement
action may be brought.
There are also two Pan
American Conventions:
(a) Mexico City Convention
of 1902; and (b)
Buenos Aires Convention
of 1922. These are
agreements among approximately
17 South American
member countries wherein
a copyright obtained
in one state is valid in
the other states
without formalities provided
a notice reserving
all property rights is
included. The notice
must read "copyright
reserved"
or "all rights reserved".
This
is not a very strong union,
as the United
States has separate treaties
with most of
the member countries. The
Pan American Union
is primarily of benefit
to U.S. citizens
who wish to obtain protection
for their works
in Bolivia.
The United States also
has special treaties
with a number of countries
such as Taiwan
to confer reciprocal copyright
protection
to U.S. and Taiwan citizens.
In addition,
the U.S. has enacted special
legislation
which extends U.S. copyright
law to Guam
and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
International protection
for patents, trademarks
and copyrights is widely
available and becoming
more and more necessary
as the global marketplace
becomes more a reality
to all businesses,
not just large multinational
corporations.
Careful planning can result
in inexpensive
yet extensive and valuable
protection for
products in international
markets.
|
|
 |
 |
|